US Market News

Pharma stock investors brace for billions in heartburn drug litigation charges

In this article

Shares of GSK, Sanofi and Haleon all sold off sharply this week, shedding tens of billions in market value, amid investor fear over potential U.S. litigation charges focused on popular heartburn drug Zantac.

This has been a known issue bubbling in the background for years but investor concern exploded this week in the lead-up to the first scheduled legal proceeding on Aug 22.

What is Zantac?

Zantac is the brand name for a drug called ranitidine, a medicine used to relieve heartburn. It was originally invented and sold by GSK as a prescription drug in the 1980s before transitioning to an over-the-counter medicine.

In 2019, regulators launched a safety review amid concern the drug contains a probable carcinogen called NDMA, prompting manufacturers to pull it from shelves. And by 2020, the U.S. FDA and the European Medicines Agency requested all versions of the treatment be withdrawn from the market.

Since then, more than 2,000 cases have been filed in the U.S. with plaintiffs contending that consuming Zantac can generate NDMA.

The first trial begins Aug. 22 with key bellwether cases to begin in early 2023.

Packages of Zantac, a popular medication which decreases stomach acid production and prevents heartburn, sit on a shelf at a drugstore in New York City.
Drew Angerer | Getty Images

The litigation is particularly complicated because so many pharma players have been involved with the drug.

The patent for the medicine expired in 1997, so there are multiple manufacturers, retailers and distributors of the drug named as defendants in the lawsuits.

There have been multiple owners of the OTC rights in the U.S. since 1998, including GSK, Sanofi, Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim.

Haleon, the consumer health business spun off from GSK last month, is not primarily liable for the claims, according to the company, but may be tangentially linked.

Company responses

In response to the violent share price moves this week, GSK, Sanofi and Haleon have all issued statements defending themselves.

The drugmakers’ stock prices stabilized Friday morning.

A GSK spokesperson said: “The overwhelming weight of the scientific evidence supports the conclusion that there is no increased cancer risk associated with the use [of] ranitidine … Suggestions to the contrary are therefore inconsistent with the science and GSK will vigorously defend itself against all meritless claims.”

A Sanofi spokesperson said: “There is no reliable evidence that Zantac causes any of the alleged injuries under real-world conditions, and Sanofi remains fully confident in its defenses. Given the strength of our case and the uncertainty of future proceedings no contingencies have been established.”

Zantac is the brand name for a drug called ranitidine, a medicine used to relieve heartburn.
The Washington Post | The Washington Post | Getty Images

Haleon’s involvement and potential liability appear less clear-cut.

Haleon asserts that it is not a party to any of the Zantac claims, saying it “never marketed Zantac in any form in the U.S.” and is “not primarily liable for any OTC or prescription claims.”

However, as flagged by GSK in a prospectus issued on June 1, “to the extent GSK and/or Pfizer are held liable in respect of OTC Zantac, Haleon may be required to indemnify GSK and/or Pfizer” under certain conditions.

Pfizer said in a statement Thursday that it believes the outcome of the litigation is “not likely to be material” to the company.

“As disclosed in our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission since February 2020, a number of lawsuits have been filed against many defendants, including Pfizer, involving Zantac,” Pfizer said.

“Pfizer sold Zantac only between 1998 and 2006, and the withdrawal of Zantac products from the market in 2019 and 2020 did not involve any Pfizer products. Pfizer has significant defenses to this litigation and there are significant legal and factual issues that remain to be addressed by the courts. Pfizer also has substantial indemnification claims against others, which have been acknowledged by several manufacturers in their disclosures,” it added.

Boehringer was not immediately available to comment when contacted by CNBC on Friday. A spokesperson told Reuters the company would defend itself against any allegations.

What are the analysts saying?

“As with all legal outcomes, there are considerable uncertainties,” Credit Suisse’s European pharma team said in a note. “That is particularly true in this case where four companies have been involved in the ownership of Zantac rights over time”.

As the brand originator, GSK could be on the hook for the bulk of the liabilities, rather than the OTC manufacturers, according to the team.

British equity research firm Redburn said in a note that given there are multiple manufacturers of the drug as well as retailers and distributors named as defendants, this potentially reduces the absolute impact at the company level.

Deutsche Bank Research’s pharmaceuticals team on Thursday upgraded its recommendation on Sanofi from hold to buy on the basis that “the Zantac knee-jerk is starting to look somewhat overdone.”

The German bank does not think it is an obvious buying opportunity but contends that “maintaining a Sell at these levels feels egregious.”

The team adds, “Both GSK/SAN now appear to present a classic conundrum: ensnared by anxiety over an impending liability overhang they cannot yet fully assess.”

How big could the settlements be?

Credit Suisse says this depends on the strength that the court sees from any link between NDMA and cancer and any evidence of wrongdoing.

Previous drug settlements have ranged from $30,000 to $270,000 per claimant based on evidence of wrongdoing.

There are currently more than 2,000 known claimants but this is expected to increase as the trials proceed.

Comparison with Bayer, Monsanto

For many investors and analysts, this ordeal brings back memories of the Bayer Roundup saga.

Shortly after Bayer took over Monsanto in 2018, Roundup-related lawsuits quickly swelled, ultimately costing Bayer billions of dollars and years of legal and financial uncertainty.

Like in the case of Bayer’s acquisition of Monsanto where the litigation risk was pointed out to investors before the deal was completed, GSK flagged the Zantac litigation as a key risk for Haleon in the prospectus issued to investors in June.

In the nearly 500-page document, GSK warned, “The Group has indemnification obligations in favour of the GSK Group and the Pfizer Group, which could be significant and have a material adverse effect” on the group’s finances.

In contrast to Bayer’s Roundup, Zantac has been withdrawn by regulators worldwide. Further, there are currently more than 2,000 claims related to Zantac and other ranitidine products compared with Bayer who faced 130,000 glyphosate-related cases.

“We don’t think the evidence points to this as another glyphosate, but it is very possible we may see a liability of some $bn magnitude,” writes Deutsche Bank.

This post has been syndicated from a third-party source. View the original article here.

Related Articles

Back to top button